Sunday was bridge day with lots of children time too
I had a lovely Sunday. Colin, Luise, Jessica and Marcus slept over. The kids love a sleepover. We had pancakes for brunch. I made some batter and the kids put strawberries, bananas and chocolate chips into custom pancakes. After that we watched Cloudy With A Chance Of Meatballs. I have to say that Jessica liked Walt Disney’s Snow White (which we watched the night before) a whole lot better. Walt Disney had magic.
After the kids left the day was full of bridge. I pondered systems over 2. Do you like playing control showing responses? I was thinking about inverting 2 to show more controls than 2 because it seems to me that when you have more controls you need more space not less. Thoughts on this matter are welcome.
Later on I watched the finals of Women’s Canadian curling while I played some bridge. Fortunately I have a TV mounted right beside my computer. (Okay maybe my bridge playing was a touch distracted). It was an exciting final and an interesting display of “fear of winning”. Going into End 8 out of 10 the Prince Edward Island team had a formidable two point lead with the hammer. They did badly in eight, nine and ten and eventually lost in an extra end. It was as if knowing that they would be the first team ever to win a major curling championship from PEI, the pressure was just too much.
Back at my bridge game, this deal provided a bit of a bidding challenge for me. I held: A94 Q54 A107 KQJ2
I opened 1NT in second chair and partner raised to 4NT. Is slam worth a go? I have 16 points right in the middle of the range and the spot in diamonds and spades might be helpful. The J is a better card than than some jacks. But I decided to pass.
It was the 4-3-3-3 shape that did me in. I was happy I had passed when I saw my partner’s hand. She had J32 AJ KQJ A9854
6NT is not a good spot. It does have some play. If the heart finesse works you might make via a squeeze of some sort. If my LHO holds the top two spades along with the heart king there is a simple squeeze and it works with or without the count. You can just run winners or you can lead a spade towards the jack earlier on.
Is 6 better? It requires less card reading but it does need the same holdings in the east-west hand. Best to play in game as we did. Well done partner. If she had transferred to clubs and then bid 4NT (as I might have done) we would have been in the poor slam.
Here was one more interesting decision. Your hand is:
Your partner opens 1 at favorable vulnerable and RHO bid 1. You bid 2 and partner bids 2NT. Righty isn’t finished; vulnerable or no, he bids 3. What do you do?
I think double here should just show a good hand. You can’t have trump. You are just setting up a force and letting partner decide. You could bid 3NT or 4 but maybe you are better defending. Let partner decide. That was the decision of my expert partner and it was a very good one.
I wasn’t sure it was the right thing to do but with only one spade stopper I was going to have to run nine tricks in 3NT and I didn’t fancy the 5-2 in hearts (which broke 5-1 not too surprisingly). 3 doubled only went down one but this was a great result since we could make nothing.
Just after this I had a session with Colin. Here is another deal in my series bidding slams without Blackwood. With both side not vulnerable Colin held
He opened 1 strong and I bid 2NT. This shows 12-14 HCP, with no suit longer than five cards. RHO bid 4, and Colin bid 4, showing his suit. He knew that I had a good hand and it was important to get his suit in. I wouldn’t give up on a suitable hand. I had
I suppose I could bid 4NT, keycard. If I do Colin will bid 5 (3). I could bid 5 which would get 6. I could bid 6 and Colin would bid 6 which would end the auction. There is nothing wrong with this auction.
But once Colin shows a hand worth 16 points or more and hearts nothing is keeping me from slam. The bigger issue is should we be in 7. Would Colin go to the grand with the hand below over keycard? I don’t think so.
What I actually did was bid 5 over 4. Colin bid 5 and I bid 5. Colin bid 6 which was doubled. I bid 6. Now would Colin have bid 7 on the hand above? I pretty well have to have the diamond king, club ace, and the spade king at least. Do I absolutely have to have the spade ace? It seems likely. We will never know the answer.
Colin had to play carefully because the hearts were 4-1 and the long hearts had four clubs (and fortunately also the K. A dummy reversal looks attractive (ruffing diamonds in the long hand) but in fact I believe it needs the same things.
Do you like my bid on the next hand or not?
Red on white 1 was opened in front of me and I bid 2 which worked out well when we won the auction with 3. I know I don’t have much but my bid takes up a lot of space and other excuses. Here is a second slam hand (I wimped out and bid Blackwood.) However I think the play is the thing on this board.
We arrived in 6 after Colin showed five clubs, heart support and stuff.
Colin
Me
The opening lead was the J. Maybe the best line is to draw trump. Suppose I win the spade in dummy and hook the heart. I can win the return, say a club in hand. Draw another round of trump and play spades ruffing the third round in dummy. I can get back to my hand with a diamond and draw the rest of the trump. If trump behaves decently I can throw my losers on the diamonds, twelve tricks. If the heart finesse wins I follow the same line but I have extra chances.
What does this line need? Only one heart loser basically. If hearts are 3-2 and the finesse loses then I can’t stand spade ruff of the second round or a spade ruff in the third round with the 10. I think any line involving setting up the clubs is just not as good (even though the club spots are nice).
What I actually did was win the spade in hand and start with a high trump from hand. When the 10 came down on the first round I was much better position for a spade ruff so I stopped drawing trump, cashed the diamond, crossed on a spade, played diamonds pitching my losers, returned on the K, ruffed a spade and played the 9. LHO, who started with Qxxx, could only make one trump trick. I still don’t know what the mathematically best line is. I just know mine worked. I had the added disadvantage of a kibbitzer (who shall not be named) standing in my office and yelling at me to do the wrong things. Here is the whole deal and if you have some comments I would be interested.
A4 | ||
Q1085 | J92
J10653 |
|
K763
K102 |
I had one other hand that Colin announced was Linda proof but it really wasn’t. Here was the hand which I did make (but not without some sweat).
1094 | ||
A5 |
After opening 2NT I arrived in 4. I won the opening lead of the K and tried two rounds of trump with RHO showing out on the second round (won in dummy). I tried a club from dummy. RHO won the K with the A and played two rounds of spades.
10 | ||
— |
I ruffed high and drew the remaining trump in two rounds. Now all I had to do was guess diamonds. About this point I am thinking couldn’t I have played this hand on a safer line. Well, if you are going to play like this you better be able to guess well. I don’t really have a count. I know RHO has four hearts and three spades and some clubs. I am missing nine clubs so if they split somewhat equally he has three or four of them at least. I think he is odds on to be short in diamonds.
I played the K and both followed (rats). Now I am thinking diamonds were never bid by our side. With four trump and a spade sequence how likely is it that you would lead your stiff diamond? I decided not that likely so I finessed and that was right. So it was Linda proof and I made five in the end. Given that I only had to make four maybe its safer to play diamonds earlier! Perhaps I should duck the opening spade lead, win the continuation, play the two top hearts and then play diamonds finessing. West can ruff but I still make it.
1094 | ||
KQJ3
A864 |
8762 | |
A5 |
Some family news, sports commentary, and a healthy dose of bridge. I hope the content police don’t excoriate you Linda. Thanks for sharing.
Hey, Ross, that’s a big word! Excorciate — wow! But, I’ve got my own problems here trying to tie in different blogs involving a newcomer to the blogging scene on another site (shown on ours) and Bobby — all regarding the ridiculous problem of what constitutes being qualified to be SELECTED as a nominee for the Hall of Fame. I am in the process of trying to tie all the loose ends together and present the positions as a new blog as concisely as possible.
Judy
I don’t like controls over 2C. You show your controls and then look for a fit? Possibly at the three level? No thanks. I know I’m old fashioned, because I also don’t like 2H as a double negative.
I don’t really like bidding over 2C at all. I avoid it. I open huge hands at the one level. I have never played controls over 2C before myself. I think I will bid a whole bunch in a bidding closet and see how it goes.
I am definitely looking forward to Judy’s definitive HoF blog!
Judy (et alius)
I first came across the word excoriate in an article many ears ago about Canada’s own famed press baron – Conrad Black. (Later known as Lord Black of Crossharbour).
Conrad is a remarkable man – complex to be sure – and a living, walking, historian and dictionary.
I loved the sound of the word and adopted it immediately thereafter.
He has written a couple of fine books himself, and been the subject of a few more.
Thanks, Ross:
It only goes to prove the old saying, “You learn something new every day.” I could take the word (never having seen it before) and easily figure out to what you were alluding, but I liked the sound of it and your point was well made in melodious fashion.
Judy