Linda Lee — My personal bridge blog

The final round: Sweden versus France Part 1

The twenty board set between Sweden and France in the final round was an important match for Sweden who needed to win to be sure of a spot in the top sixth and a Bermuda Bowl berth.  France who was out of the running was acting as a spoiler.  If you are interested in the details of the player’s systems you can find them at www.ecatsbridge.com.   Board 2 was a bidding competition.

Dealer: East

Vul: N-S

North

A1052

K1094

63

J85

West

K

Q73

AKQ10874

97

East

9876

A5

J

AKQ1062

South

QJ43

J862

952

42

The diamond slam East-West is pretty good but getting there is the trick.  This was the start of the French auction:

Chemla Fredin Levy Fallenius
1 pas
1 pass 1 pass
3 pass ?

I suppose that East, perhaps concerned about spades and perhaps dreaming about bigger things might bid 3.  If that is forward-going West might take the push (perhaps using some kind of ace asking structure like 4 or 4).  That was a pipe dream in the Open Room and East bid the expected 3NT.  Could the Closed Room get it right?

Upmark Mari Cullin Volcker
2 pass
3 pass 3 pass
4 pass 4♥* pass
4♠* pass 5NT pass
6 all pass

Here the Swedish East, Cullin, opened 2♣, Precision style, showing a limited hand with five or more clubs (and possibly a four-card major).  In this auction West’s 3 was game forcing showing at least six good diamonds.  When East emphasized his clubs and West his diamonds the pair cuebid their way to slam.  Cullin’s 5NT asked West to pick the slam.  Their system works well on this deal.  As a point of interest in the Russia-Iceland match both pairs got to the diamond slam but both were playing a strong club and the auctions were similar to the Cullin-Upmark auction while in the Italy-Israel match both pairs playing a more standard system open 1♣ and played in 3NT.  9 imps to Sweden.  By Board 6 Sweden was leading 18 imps to 2.

Dealer: E

Vul: E-W

North

8

J103

Q9753

6532

West

AK6

K976542

10

J7

East

1075432

A

AJ862

8

South

QJ9

Q8

K4

AKQ1094

I have noticed that the strong clubbers really open the bidding light.  Here Cullin in the Closed Room holding the East hand opened 1♠ .  My preference is to pass.  In the Open Room Levy did just that.  Strangely, the pair that opened light ended up selling out to a North-South partscore while the pair that did not open got to game.

Upmark Mari Cullin Volcker
1 1NT
2* pass 2 3
3♠ 4 all pass

Volcker overcalled 1NT and then bid clubs and West no doubt used to the light openings surprisingly sold out to 4♣ In the Closed Room South opened 1♣ .

Chemla Fredin Levy Fallenius
pass 1
1 pass 1 2
2 pass 4 pass
pass 5 DBL all pass

Once East-West bid the game Sweden took the save and ended with -500.

Coming into Board 10 Sweden and France were in a virtual tie Sweden 18, France 19.  Board 10 showed that this match was not just about bidding.  Eddie Kantar wrote a book called Take All Your Chances and that is what this deal is all about

Dealer: E

Vul: Both

North

6

A10754

KJ

KQ954

West

J43

9863

Q10862

10

East

K85

Q

A7543

J862

South

AQ10972

KJ2

9

A73

Do you want to be in slam on this deal?  In the heart slam, you have to find the trump queen and you must be able to pick it up,  you need a club break or something else good to happen (as we will see).  So not good enough.  But when you look at all the hands it seems like 6 will have good chances while 6♣ will fail on the bad trump break.  The difference is holding that keycard, the trump 10.  (My bidding system does not allow me to check for that!)

In the Open Room Sweden did make a try but slam was not reached.

Chemla Fredin Levy Fallenius
pass 1
pass 2 pass 3
pass 3* pass 4
pass 4 all pass

I think this is a decent auction and Sweden ended in the right place.  But would virtue be punished?  In the Closed Room this is what happened.

Upmark Mari Cullin Volcker
pass 1
pass 2 pass 3
pass 4 pass 4NT
pass 5 pass 6
all pass

So much for science.  After Volcker blasted 6, it was up to Mari to make it.  And as we will see he had a blind spot.  Oddly this blind spot also occurred in at least one other match, where Russia also in 6 followed the same line.  The opening lead was helpful the A.  Cullin continued diamonds, Mari winning.  When Mari led a heart to dummy the queen appeared.  Another hurdle over.  He now drew 4 rounds of trump while Cullin shed diamonds.  This was the position.

Dealer: E

Vul: Both

North

♠ 6

7

♦-

KQ954

West

♠ J43

Q82

10

East

♠ K85

J862

South

♠ AQ109

A73

Now Mari cashed the K and the 10 dropped (a hint perhaps?).  If East has four clubs (and surely West can’t be the one with the long clubs or he would have kept his 10!) there is no way to pick up the suit and North will surely go down.  But there is a ray of hope in the spade suit.  North should cash the Q (preserving dummy’s entry) if the suit splits he can cash the A and ruff a spade back in hand to claim.  But when the suit doesn’t split as here he still can fallback on spades.  He finesses the Q cashes the A and ruffs a spade.  The A still in dummy provides an entry to the now good spades and voila!  But Mari made the natural (but wrong play of a club to the A rather than cashing the Q and voila, one down.  13 imps to Sweden instead of 13 imps to France a big 26 imp swing.  At the halfway point Sweden led 31-19.

To be continued …


2 Comments

John CatchJuly 5th, 2010 at 2:55 pm

Gromoeller for Germany made it the way you described. Yet I think even he would have gone down on a normal spade switch at trick two.

Tommy Gullberg made it for the Swedish Seniors as well. I couldn’t find any data how.

newsDecember 20th, 2011 at 1:01 am

3 cheese

Leave a comment

Your comment