Linda Lee — My personal bridge blog

The biggest swing in the first segment of a Vanderbilt semi

The first segment in the Vanderbilt semi final (Grue versus Kang) was full of swings with more going to Grue than to Kang (57-35).  Two deals were played in grands.  Both of them excellent and one was missed at one of the tables.  But the biggest swing wasn’t a slam.  It was a hand played at the one level at both tables.  In the Open Room. you hold this hand and with nobody vulnerable he opens 1 of the nebulous short kind with a limited hand.  South overcalls 1NT.  What do you do?

West

Q1064

Q102

A105

J54

Me, I pass.  I have as I count them 9 average high card points a bit more for the 10’s a bit less for the quacky nature and balanced shape.  I am not at all sure what to lead.  It looks like one of those hands which you play at the two level.  Call me mouse.  At the table Curtis Cheek decided to double and I can’t really fault that.  I am guessing a bit here but North’s pass forced a redouble and this went all pass.  1NT redoubled.  Don’t worry too much about what to lead.  Here is the whole deal and 1NT redouble is cold for two.

Dealer:

Vul:

North

K95

864

Q8742

103

West

Q1064

Q102

A105

J54

East

J7

AKJ3

93

K8762

South

♠ A832

975

KJ6

AQ9

At the other table East opened a weak 1NT and played it there.  Somehow the defense never found the diamond suit and 1NT made 3 the other way.  However if East-West had just defended 1NT undoubled Open Room making 2 the result would have been +120 and +150 for a total of +270 or 7 imps for Kang.  The redouble made it 14.

There is no moral to this story.  And if there was one it would probably be … shit happens.


1 Comment

Nigel KearneyMarch 19th, 2011 at 9:47 pm

Knowing that South can be weaker than a normal 1NT overcall does make the double more attractive. But I am not sure whether West knew that or not.

Leave a comment

Your comment