Not Dull At All
The 8 Canucks (one with an American accident) met again tonight for 24 boards and quite a lot of action. I was not concentrating on the first couple of boards. I was busy all day yesterday and I was in a rush to make it on time to the game. There is a lesson there. I need to find a way to get set when playing online bridge. I need to think about the best way to get my brain in action. Maybe I need to go through a more deliberate checklist at each major point on the first hand. Anyone have any suggestions or ways they “get into the game”?
I did completely and egregiously misplay 3NT on the first board. I am going to write it up but in the mastering bridge blog as a lesson to new players! Since we are now featuring the Mastering Bridge blog feed on Bridge Blogging the deal in question will show up here a little later on.
Sondra and Isabelle are doing very well. We compared with them again tonight and any time I thought we had a good result they duplicated it or even improved on it. Let’s start with an interesting problem for East-West. At favorable vulnerability you hold this hand fourth to speak.
| ♠ AQ108532 |
| ♥ — |
| ◊ KQJ10 |
| ♣ A2 |
North opens 1♥ and South makes an irritating bid 1♠. What is your plan? I don’t have an answer to this question. The choices I see at this point are pass, 2♠ (if natural), 4♠. If you pass you might enter the auction in spades later or even somehow get diamonds into play.
Herve holding this hand bid a natural 2♠. Pamela bid 3◊. What now? Herve bid a simple 5◊ which was doubled.
At the our table the auction started the same way but Jeff passed. I suspect that 2♠ was not natural for him. North (me) bid 2♣ and Sylvia raised to 3♣. It’s your turn. Jeff bid 4♠. I think 3♠ might have bid enough but maybe I am being too fine.
Neither contract had much play when dummy arrived with a very disappointing hand and of course you know the spades don’t break.
Dummy is:
| ♠ 9 |
| ♥ AQ8753 |
| ◊ 8543 |
| ♣ 97 |
The biggest single swing was on this hand and is an opening lead problem. Paul Thurston held
| ♠ — |
| ♥ 642 |
| ◊ AQJ82 |
| ♣ J10765 |
| Jeff | Linda | Paul | Sylvia |
| pass | 1♥ | 2NT | 4♣ |
| 5◊ | 6♥ | all pass |
Given as a problem I think most “panelists” would find the lead of a diamonds. We could argue about whether the ◊J or ◊8 is better. I like the ◊8 and that is the one Paul led to get his spade ruff. I would also say that I liked Sylvia’s slightly pushy 4♣ splinter. Her hand was
| ♠ KQ873 |
| ♥ Q975 |
| ◊ 1053 |
| ♣ Q |
Well done to all, sigh.
Here is a hand on which we blew the defense.
| ♠ K |
| ♥ Q95 |
| ◊ A10854 |
| ♣ A542 |
The auction is:
| Jeff | Linda | Paul | Sylvia |
| pass | |||
| pass | 1◊ | 1♥ | 1♠ |
| 2◊ | pass (less than 3 spades) | 2♥ | 3◊ |
| pass | pass | 3♥ | pass |
| pass | ? |
Sylvia led the ◊6 and dummy has
| ♠ 1096 |
| ♥ AJ8 |
| ◊ Q73 |
| ♣ Q1076 |
I won the ◊A. What is the best thing to do now? I want to make sure that Sylvia overtakes the ♠K but how do I do it? In retrospect I think it would have been better to cash the ♣A first. I led the ♠K and it was game over.
| ♠ AQ852 |
| ♥ 10 |
| ◊ J962 |
| ♣ 983 |
At the other table they played 4◊. This can be defeated on a club lead but it is nigh impossible to find.
| Linda | ||
| ♠ K | ||
| ♥ Q95 | ||
| ◊ A10854 | ||
| Jeff | ♣ A542 | Paul |
| ♠ 1096 | ♠ J543 | |
| ♥ AJ8 | ♥ K76432 | |
| ◊ Q73 | ◊ K | |
| ♣ Q1076 | Sylvia | ♣ KJ |
| ♠ AQ852 | ||
| ♥ 10 | ||
| ◊ J962 | ||
| ♣ 983 |

