Linda Lee — My personal bridge blog

European Mixed Teams – the semis

I enjoyed watching the semifinals today much better than the quarterfinals.  It seemed like they all had turned it up a notch.

The first segment of 14 boards was mostly pretty dull though.  Almost no imps changed hands.  In the Mahaffey-Vriend match the final result sounded like an exciting baseball score … 9 to 8.  It was 10 to 8 in the Zimmermann-Badger match.   Naturally I was a commentator for one of these matches and had to talk about the coffee, the weather and whether the Dutch use of two clubs to show either a good balanced hand or a weak two in diamonds was a good treatment.

All the fun stuff seem to happen in Board 15-28.  Board 23 we curious.  In each match one table played 3NT and the other played in a slam.  When I show you the deal you can decide who won the imps

Dealer:

Vul:

North

♠ A953

♥ AQJ

♦ K

♣ K8742

West

♠ KJ10874

♥ 864

♦ A32

♣ 6

East

♠ Q2

♥ 10972

♦ 864

♣ 10953

South

♠ 6

♥ K53

♦ QJ10974

♣ AQJ

3NT has no problem of course and a slam in diamonds will make as well.  In each match one of the North-South pairs arrived in 6♣ .  Both of those pairs got the killing spade lead and both went down.

With all vulnerable, the auction in the Closed Room in the Zimmerman-Badger match was as follows:

Multon Osborne Willard Hinden
— — — 1♦
2♠ 3♣ Pass 4♣
Pass 5♦ Pass 6♣
All pass

Do you think that South could have anticipated a trump problem on a spade lead and considered a diamond slam?  I think North’s diamond bid must show either the ace or king.  Maybe that is too hard.  In the Open Room South, D;Ovidio just bid 3♦ over 3♣ and this allowed North, Cronier to bid 3NT.

Both of the losing teams get bronze medals (sensibly) and the winners move onto the final tomorrow.

Leave a comment

Your comment