Linda Lee — My personal bridge blog

Do I Have To Cash Now? … Final of the GNT

Going into Board 64 of the Grand National Teams Flight A Lilenstein (Jared Lilienstein – Sam Lev – John Hurd – Michael Polowan – Brian Glubok, New York NY; Joel Wooldridge, Astoria NY) was leading Spector  (Warren Spector, Palm Beach FL; Michael Becker – David Berkowitz, Boca Raton FL; Gary Cohler, Miami FL; Jeff Meckstroth – Eric Rodwell, Clearwater Beach FL) by 4 imps.  Board 64 was an exciting deal.  North-South have a decent small slam in hearts.  However on the lie of the cards a grand slam in hearts can be made if the defenders do not take the cashing ace of clubs on the opening lead.  When Cohler-Berkowitz got to this grand slam AND made it the lead changed and Lilenstein was the winner.  I am sure others will write about Board 64.

I want to write about Board 61.  At the start of Board 61 Lilenstein led 111 to 95.  With only four boards to go Spector, down by 26 imps had to make a big move soon.  North was the dealer with both vulnerable.  This was the auction in both Rooms.

Lev
Glubok
1
1NT
3
3
4
All Pass

At both tables West led a top diamond and saw this dummy.

 
N
Lev
AKQ108
K8
106
AQJ2
W
Meckstroth
965
942
AK753
108
 

 

At both tables partner signaled to show an odd count in diamonds.  What now?

It appears that you have two diamond tricks.  Your only other tricks can come from trump or clubs.  The only way you can have two trump tricks is if partner has the ace and queen of hearts.  The other hope is to play partner for one heart winner and the CK.  So let’s give partner the  A and the  K.

You still have to decide whether you have to cash another diamond immediately.  A diamond loser could go away on the top spades in dummy.

If declarer is 0-6-2-5  and is missing the  A and the  K if you don’t cash the second diamond declarer could discard a diamond on the top spade and you will not defeat the contract.  Cashing the second diamond works because three spade pitches are not enough for declarer.  But that means that partner has an even number of diamonds.

But if declarer is 0-6-3-4 (as suggested by partner’s signal) declarer could get rid of their presumed club loser by discarding them away on the spades.  Still there is hope.  In this scenario declarer has three diamonds and in fact the third diamond will still be a loser.  This is the actual deal.

 

 
61
Both
North
N
Lev
AKQ108
K8
106
AQJ2
 
W
Meckstroth
965
942
AK753
108
 
E
Rodwell
J7432
A3
J92
K73
 
S
Glubok
QJ10765
Q84
9654
 
Here a club lead at trick two defeats the contract.  If Glubok wins and discards clubs he has no way to get rid of the third diamond.  He could try leading a diamond at trick six but you win and return a trump.  Suppose instead he discard diamonds planning to give up one diamond, one trump and one club.  Then  when Rodwell is in on the trump ace he will cash the  K and give Meckstroth a club ruff.   Even if Glubok is 1-6-3-3 a club lead is required. 
The answer to “Do I have to cash a second diamond now?” is “no”.   If partner has shown an odd number of diamonds than there is no rush to cash the second diamond and in fact, as on this deal, it may be fatal.  Switching to a club at trick two was worth 12 imps.
My congratulations to both teams.  

1 Comment

Michael YuenJuly 16th, 2012 at 6:20 pm

Board 61 was good bridge, great club switch by Meckstroth.

As for board 64, too bad luck played a part in the outcome.

For my money, even if declarer had 2 voids hard to see how Ace of club can cost.

Nice write up.

Leave a comment

Your comment